Opinions expressed on the Whig Blog, in the Forums and in comments are those of the individual authors and do not necessarilly represent positions of the Modern Whig Party. The ability to post opinion pieces and comments is not restricted to Whig members (although blog entries are by invitation.) These items are not pre-screened but are subject to our Terms of Use. Please Contact Us or Ask a Question if you have concerns about the content.
Few people would debate that the Internet is an integral part of the modern world and is perhaps the largest engine for artistic expression, economic growth, scientific advancement and human freedom in the whole of human history, and will likely only become even more so in the future. Of course, with that in mind, it makes all too perfect sense that the government wants to ruin it.
While the news itself seems to be mostly preoccupied with Kim Kardashian's divorce or other such trivialities, a bill has come before the House of Representatives, HR3261, better known as the Stop Online Piracy Act, or SOPA for short. This stated purpose of this bill, if passed and implemented, would be used by the entertainment industry to further crack down on digital piracy and enforcing intellectual copyrights. However, like so many other government efforts to regulate or legislate, the potential for both abuse and disaster are enormous.
First let me point out that, despite past efforts to stop Internet piracy, both by lawmakers and the entertainment industry, it has continued, and will continue, and there is not a damn thing they can do about it. The entertainment industry brought the pirating issue on themselves by both charging obscene amounts of money for an often sub-par product, as well as refusing to reform outdated copyright laws so that they are more practical in the digital age. As a result, people used technology to get these goods at a much more fair market price, and the entertainment industry claimed this was why their profits were down, and it had nothing at all to do with the recent downward trend in the quality of their products. If the entertainment industry would work with advancing technology and social media, rather than against it by trying and litigate people back into paying for the latest flavor of the week offering from the media peddlers, there is a good chance a mutually beneficial agreement could have been reached years ago. Instead, we get these perennially passed bills in Congress, followed by surprise from Washington and Hollywood when piracy grows further.
If this was just the latest laughable feeble attempt to stop piracy, I might be able to just shrug this off as the latest attempt by a bunch of pencil-pushers to regulate something not one of them likely understands or uses. However, there is more than a little to be worried about SOPA with.
For starters, it is far too familiar with the earlier Protect IP Act, which after being put forward in the Senate, was thankfully killed after massive public opposition as well as notable technical issues about the implementation bill itself. had it been passed, it would have created a blacklist of websites that the government would force Internet service providers to block, as well as penalizing advertisers who use those sites. In a way, SOPA is far worse than it's senatorial cousin, as the qualifications of penalization are far more open and left to interpretation in this version, leaving any website that is believed to be in violation of copyright law, and even websites that 'don't do enough to stop piracy', open to both litigation and being shut down.
Not surprisingly, this has a great deal of people up in arms, worried over the loosely worded bill and it's massive potential for abuse, which is no small worry when you remember recent bills to lower health care costs send them through the roof, and ones to make airports safer result in having cancer-ridden grandmothers getting strip searched. The outcry on the Internet has, not surprisingly, been overwhelmingly negative, with a rare coalition of sites ranging from big players like Google, Facebook, Yahoo, eBay, Amazon and the like, down to groups like Anonymous or ThatGuyWithTheGlasses, getting the word about the bill out, as well as providing the few voices of dissent in the congressional hearings for the bill. In a rare moment of solidarity, the Tea Party has denounced it for government overreach and as a danger to free speech and the free market, just as some OWS groups have derided it as Washington's latest attempts to sell out to lobbyists and corporations. Business experts have been fast to point out it would devastate one of the economies fastest growing sectors in favor of outdated business models, and legal experts have pointed out the potential to further flood our legal system with frivolous lawsuits. As a whole, the reaction has been overwhelmingly negative, and the reaction from nearly all but the entertainment industry has been of one of both anger and fear.
And why should they not be? Even ignoring the massive potential for abuse, which given past patterns by both the government and entertainment industry, will happen, the bill itself is worded in such a way it could effectively kill the Internet as we know it. The Congressional hearings showed full well that most of the congressmen supporting this bill have little idea of how the Internet works, and under this law, it would be up to their discretion what sites qualify for blacklisting. The entertainment has shown time and time again its disdain for all things digital, as anyone who has ever pulled up a pulled YouTube video knows, and their pattern of litigating individuals for millions of dollars for at most music worth a few hundreds of dollars does not bode well for what they would do with the powers SOPA would allow them. Considering that there are already laws on the books that allow them to protect their intellectual property, make no mistake this is yet another power grab by the entertainment industry at the expense of the American consumer.
Worse, implementation of this bill would require the restructuring of how the Internet actually functions, and would require creation of a system not too far removed from the ones used in dictatorships like Iran or the PRC, giving the USA it's very own Great Firewall of China. Now if the thoughts of the US government is able to shut down Web sites at the slightest provocation, where elected representatives invoke fears of "overseas pirates" to defend the interests of domestic industries, and where Internet companies like Google must cave in to the demands of government censors or risk being shut down doesn't send shutters down your spine, the fact it spits in the face of the Constitution to do so should. While the bill's advocates have been quick to point out the constitutionality of Copyright law, and I will confess that I am no constitutional scholar, I would hope that copyright law would take a back seat to more fundamental freedoms, like for example, providing for the general welfare, or of course, freedom of speech and expression. Even if the bill passes and is in time struck down by the Supreme Court for constitutionality, it would still be enough time to cripple to Internet, much akin to how the Affordable Healthcare Act caused health insurance costs to rise long before it either took effect or went before the Supreme Court for review.
In the end, that is the reason more than anything why the bill needs to fail: SOPA will not stop piracy, allows for massive potential for censorship and abuse, and in the end making the Internet less safe and reliable, and one that violates the constitution in doing so. It would be a blow to liberty and the economy that we as a nation can ill afford.
The Internet is a modern marvel that has changed every aspect of society for the better. It allows global communication in the blink of an eye, the free exchange of knowledge and media, as well as allowing anybody to share their own thoughts or creations with the world. It has already proven to be the strongest part of the global economy, providing 2.6 jobs for every one it replaces, as well as making up the majority of global GDP growth in the last few years, something which is all the more important in this midst of this global recession, and will likely only grow more in the future. Perhaps most importantly, it is the greatest engine of freedom of speech and expression in the history of humanity, with international movements like the Arab Spring, and domestic ones like the Tea Party or OWS popping up overnight thanks to the freedom the Internet allows. Beyond any shadow of a doubt, the Internet is rapidly becoming the heart and soul of the modern world, and allowing the government to monitor or censor it so Hollywood can sell more movie tickets or music CD's is akin to killing to goose that layed the golden egg.
Whether you be Whig, Republican or Democrat, this is something we as Americans and members of the free world can and must stand together in opposition towards. It will hurt the economy, hurt the lives of our citizens, and stands in direct violation to the values of free speech and promoting the general welfare that our nation embodies. I urge every one of you to contact your Congressional Representatives and tell them you will not stand idly by while they trample on your liberties. Join groups that oppose it, and get the word out about this bill before it passes. If you are reading this right now, I hope you understand that the last thing we can afford to do nothing.
Thanks for writing this, Korsgaard, I feel like I understand it better now. And you are right, we should all be doing our part to stop this monstrosity from passing.
-Yelnoc (from alternatehistory.com)
I like your comment that people should be able to ensure they obtain products at a much fairer market cost.....I can understand your perspective but I do not think the word "free" is in any way fair to those of us who spend "x" amount of time, education and our own dollars to produce a "work" in which we have no fair playing field to at least earn some money for our labors. I think that I am responding more to my own perception that it seems that America is turning into a nation of entitlement and that we have some sort of "federal right" to get anything we want for free and without appreciating the work of others and to honor that notion that "free" does not equal fair market value. And, yes..I have read the bill and do think that bringing the Feds into the player mix is a disaster waiting to happen...so what's the choice then? Whipping people into a frenzy to stop this bill from becoming law is one thing...are you hoping to rely upon the generic honesty and fairness of the American population to produce its own set of controls? Apparently sites advertising kiddie porn are still "allowed" on the internet---it doesn't seem that our national ethos is doing so great on the stoppage of that one little issue so again, what is the choice here?
Korsgaard, whether or not I agree with you, that is a VERY well written position piece using the MWP ideals of BALANCE of TRUTH and PERSPECTIVE.
While our mission often seems daunting to my mind's eye, when I see the strength of the mind trust that MWP is pulling together I KNOW victory will be ours.
jegnor, there is where MWP and TP might be intersecting Venn diagrams, the notion of personal responsibility and civic duty. Our mission cannot be accomplished without more of them in all of us.
Thank you ALL for helping MWP wright the Republic for our childrens' children to flourish in.
I'm sorry but I seem to be not seeing the part about balance of truth and perspective in his piece. So tell me why I should be pleased as punch to see my work offered up for free? I understand the issue about DC getting its snout into the trough but in the grand scheme of things, why do I have to produce and provide entertainment for free? I read no perspective or sense of awareness from the business perspective of artists and others in the entertainment industry in his paragraphs. All I seem to get is somebody's think piece that this particular business is unfair to the masses.
Thanks for the feedback everyone! I'll try to respond to some of your comments, pardon the delay from me in doing so:
Conley: I'm happy that I was able to provide some perspective for you on this topic, and glad to see I'm far from the only member of AH.com here!
Gene: Thank you for your praise for my writing abilities and by loyalty to the virtues of our fair party.
Jegnor: While I understand with your opjections, I think that you and I have a more common stance on this than you might think. I do not advocate Internet Piracy by any stretch of the imagination, or for content creators to lose control of thier created media - after all, most of my created work is online, and my livlihood depends on it!
Problem is, for web-based problems from Piracy to child porn, there are already laws on the books to punish those who do indulge in them. They have no more place in the web-based free market than a robber or pedophile does in the non-digital market place. The issue is, that in-spite of attempts to crush them by legistature before, those attempts have failed because what is needed to stop Piracy is to reform the outdated copyright laws that no longer fit the digital age. This law would no more stop such attempts then the last three or four did.
What it would do is hurt the individual users of the Internet, as well as nearly every web-based media port or buisness, including even our own Modern Whigs. It is a drastic overstep of the government's authority that will stiffle the last great engine of creativity and buisness in this economy, to say nothing of failing to stop the Pirates whom this law was supposed to address.
There are great points here by all who have posted. I totally understand the reason behind SOPA, I have read the full text of the bill three times and many summaries of the bill...good times :)
Intellectual and entertainment creations are one field that is really driving what is good about the American economy and has for decades and will likely do so in the future. Piracy will always be around but more must be done to combat it.
I just don't see where SOPA would do that and the biggest reason why that is in my opinion is the language. I just see too much ambiguous language that can be interpreted different ways. Right now the interpretation might not be dangerous but what about the future. Once the government gets a power they want to fight to hold on to it just for power's sake.
In my opinion overall SOPA is just another attempt by corporate media to try to adapt the Internet to the old ways they made money instead of adapting to the digital age to make money in new ways. It comes down to changing copyright law in my opinion. I have seen this before over the past couple of years in regards to the Internet, with Net Neutrality, prohibiting local communities from offering broadband internet as a public service to their citizens.
Online Piracy will never be stopped but a huge dent can be put into it, and should be put into it. This is a proper role for government to protect commerce, especially from overseas piracy. Creators need to be able to get compensated for their work as that is how they make their living. However, there are already laws on the books for this and copyright infringement reform itself would do a lot more than just SOPA would because of the specific nature of copyright reform compared to the more general nature and language of SOPA (which is getting a lot of people nervous about censorship).
Overall I think SOPA is attempting to get at online piracy which is the main problem, massive online site wide distribution piracy. I just think that SOPA is not the proper tool for it as it is written today.
On another interesting note, Bob Goodlatte one of the main sponsors of the bill in the House, was Jeff Vanke's opponent in 2010 for U.S. Congress in Virginia.
There are great points here by all who have posted. I totally understand the reason behind SOPA, I have read the full text of the bill three times and many summaries of the bill...good times :)
Intellectual and entertainment creations are one field that is really driving what is good about the American economy and has for decades and will likely do so in the future. Piracy will always be around but more must be done to combat it.
I just don't see where SOPA would do that and the biggest reason why that is in my opinion is the language. I just see too much ambiguous language that can be interpreted different ways. Right now the interpretation might not be dangerous but what about the future. Once the government gets a power they want to fight to hold on to it just for power's sake.
In my opinion overall SOPA is just another attempt by corporate media to try to adapt the Internet to the old ways they made money instead of adapting to the digital age to make money in new ways. It comes down to changing copyright law in my opinion. I have seen this before over the past couple of years in regards to the Internet, with Net Neutrality, prohibiting local communities from offering broadband internet as a public service to their citizens.
Online Piracy will never be stopped but a huge dent can be put into it, and should be put into it. This is a proper role for government to protect commerce, especially from overseas piracy. Creators need to be able to get compensated for their work as that is how they make their living. However, there are already laws on the books for this and copyright infringement reform itself would do a lot more than just SOPA would because of the specific nature of copyright reform compared to the more general nature and language of SOPA (which is getting a lot of people nervous about censorship).
Overall I think SOPA is attempting to get at online piracy which is the main problem, massive online site wide distribution piracy. I just think that SOPA is not the proper tool for it as it is written today.
On another interesting note, Bob Goodlatte one of the main sponsors of the bill in the House, was Jeff Vanke's opponent in 2010 for U.S. Congress in Virginia.
Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer